stigma: be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.65
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings burden
Weight: 0.34
, shame
Weight: 0.34
, anxiety
Weight: 0.33
, loneliness
Weight: 0.33
, taboo
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others 1.00
do not work well 0.77
be more attractive when they be small 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(stigma, be defined as attempt to label particular group of person as less worthy of respect than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)