stingray: has physical part stingers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.68
, species
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.54
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.39
, crocodile
Weight: 0.38
, shark
Weight: 0.38
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.38
, dolphin
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part stingers 1.00
has physical part legs 0.78
has physical part tails 0.77
has physical part skin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stingray, has physical part stingers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crocodile, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(crocodile, has physical part skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(stingray, has physical part stingers)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(stingray, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(stingray, has physical part skin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(stingray, has physical part skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(stingray, has physical part stingers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crocodile, has physical part skin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(stingray, has physical part stingers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)