stock: be harder to value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder to value 1.00
have value 0.84
tend lower value 0.82
tend value 0.82
really go up in value 0.82
lose value 0.82
be harder than bonds 0.81
is hard 0.79
is difficult 0.78
increase in value 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(currency, lose value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be harder to value)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(currency, have value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be harder to value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(currency, have value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(currency, lose value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(currency, lose value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(currency, have value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(currency, have value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder to value)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(currency, lose value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder to value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(stock, be harder to value)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, have value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stock, lose value)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(stock, have value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(stock, increase in value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(stock, have value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(stock, have value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(stock, increase in value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(stock, lose value)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(stock, increase in value)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(stock, lose value)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(stock, increase in value)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(stock, lose value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be harder to value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(currency, have value)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(currency, lose value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(currency, have value)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(stock, be harder to value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(currency, lose value)