stock: be harder than bonds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder than bonds 1.00
be better than bonds 0.94
be riskier than bonds 0.90
be more volatile than bonds 0.87
have more potential for higher returns than bonds 0.86
be harder to value 0.81
be less risky than equity 0.78
be less expensive than equity 0.77
outperform bonds 0.77
be different from good debt 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt, be different from good debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt, be different from good debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be different from good debt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(stock, be harder than bonds)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be better than bonds)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder to value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(stock, be better than bonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stock, be better than bonds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(stock, be better than bonds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(stock, be harder to value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be more volatile than bonds)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(stock, be harder to value)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(stock, be harder to value)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(stock, have more potential for higher returns than bonds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stock, be harder than bonds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be different from good debt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stock, be harder than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)