strategy: affect structure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect structure 1.00
affect to society 0.77
affect method 0.76
affect strategy 0.76
affect stability 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(objective, affect method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(strategy, affect structure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(objective, affect method)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(objective, affect method)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(marketing, affect to society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(objective, affect method) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(strategy, affect structure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(marketing, affect to society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(marketing, affect to society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(strategy, affect structure)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(strategy, affect strategy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect strategy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(strategy, affect strategy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(strategy, affect strategy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(strategy, affect structure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(objective, affect method)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(marketing, affect to society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(strategy, affect structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(objective, affect method)