strategy: be be implemented effectively

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be be implemented effectively 1.00
be be implemented 0.92
is implemented 0.91
be important in implementation process 0.77
be effective 0.76
be enacted 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(policy, be effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be enacted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(policy, is implemented)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(policy, be effective)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(policy, be enacted)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(policy, be enacted)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, is implemented)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in implementation process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(policy, is implemented) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(policy, be effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be enacted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important in implementation process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in implementation process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(strategy, be be implemented effectively)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(strategy, be be implemented)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(strategy, be be implemented)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, is implemented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(policy, be effective)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(policy, be enacted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(planning, be important in implementation process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, is implemented)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(policy, be effective)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(strategy, be be implemented effectively) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(policy, be enacted)