stratification: be required in problem solving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.58
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
, element
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.51
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.33
, polarization
Weight: 0.33
, pattern
Weight: 0.32
, dispersion
Weight: 0.32
, morphology
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be required in problem solving 1.00
be required in structured problem solving 0.95
be required in problem 0.86
has state problem 0.82
be required in structured problem 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(issue, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inequality, has state problem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(polarization, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(issue, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(polarization, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(polarization, has state problem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(inequality, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(inequality, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(stratification, be required in structured problem solving)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in structured problem solving)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(stratification, be required in structured problem solving)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(stratification, be required in problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(stratification, be required in problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(stratification, has state problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in structured problem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(stratification, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(stratification, has state problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(stratification, be required in structured problem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in structured problem solving)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(stratification, be required in structured problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(stratification, has state problem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in structured problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(polarization, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(inequality, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(stratification, be required in problem solving) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(issue, has state problem)