structuralism: be important in literature

Related concepts

Parents	movement Weight: 0.62 , approach Weight: 0.59 , concept Weight: 0.56 , topic Weight: 0.42 , theory Weight: 0.41
Siblings	anarchism Weight: 0.35 , constructivism Weight: 0.35 , liberalism Weight: 0.34 , socialism Weight: 0.33 , romanticism Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in literature	1.00
be important to science	0.78
be important in art	0.78
be important to history	0.78
be important in writing	0.77
be important in sociology	0.77
be important part of sociology	0.77
be important in teaching	0.77
be relevant in science	0.77
be relevant in social science	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(movement, be important in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(movement, be important in art)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(theory, be important to science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(approach, be important in teaching)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(theory, be important in sociology)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in sociology)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important part of sociology)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to science)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(approach, be important in teaching)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(theory, be relevant in social science)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(movement, be important in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(anarchism, be important to history)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(socialism, be important to history)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important to science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(theory, be important in sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(theory, be important part of sociology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(approach, be important in teaching) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(movement, be important in art) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(theory, be relevant in social science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(socialism, be important to history) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(socialism, be important to history)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(anarchism, be important to history) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(anarchism, be important to history)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(structuralism, be important in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(structuralism, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(socialism, be important to history)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(anarchism, be important to history)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(theory, be relevant in social science)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important to science)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(approach, be important in teaching)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important in sociology)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Typical(structuralism, be important in literature) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important part of sociology)