romanticism: be important in literature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents movement
Weight: 0.67
, style
Weight: 0.64
, enlightenment
Weight: 0.56
, reaction
Weight: 0.53
, topic
Weight: 0.48
Siblings realism
Weight: 0.35
, naturalism
Weight: 0.35
, baroque
Weight: 0.35
, nationalism
Weight: 0.34
, puritanism
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in literature 1.00
be important in art 0.78
be important to history 0.78
be important in writing 0.77
be important for development of sociology 0.76
be important in theatre 0.76
be important in education 0.76
be important reading 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(style, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(enlightenment, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(style, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(movement, be important in art)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(enlightenment, be important to history)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important for development of sociology)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in literature)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(enlightenment, be important to history)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(style, be important in writing)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in literature)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in theatre)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(realism, be important in education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(naturalism, be important in art)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(style, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(style, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(style, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(enlightenment, be important to history) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(realism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in literature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(naturalism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(naturalism, be important in literature)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(realism, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in art)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(naturalism, be important in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(naturalism, be important in art)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(realism, be important in education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(realism, be important in education)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(romanticism, be important in literature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(romanticism, be important in literature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(style, be important in literature)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(movement, be important reading)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important to history)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(realism, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in literature)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(realism, be important in art)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(realism, be important in theatre)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(naturalism, be important in art)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(style, be important in literature)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(movement, be important in art)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(enlightenment, be important to history)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(romanticism, be important in literature) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(style, be important in art)
...