study: be related to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evaluation
Weight: 0.64
, journal
Weight: 0.64
, treatment
Weight: 0.60
, indicator
Weight: 0.60
Siblings report
Weight: 0.66
, cost benefit analysis
Weight: 0.64
, astronomy
Weight: 0.62
, proportion
Weight: 0.61
, literature
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to technology 1.00
be related 0.83
is related 0.83
be related to life 0.78
be related to physics 0.76
be related to history 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(proportion, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(literature, be related to life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(proportion, is related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(literature, be related to history)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(literature, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(astronomy, be related to physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(literature, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(literature, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(proportion, be related)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(proportion, be related)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(proportion, is related)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(proportion, is related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(astronomy, be related to physics)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(literature, be related to life)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(literature, be related to life)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(literature, be related to history)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(literature, be related to history)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(astronomy, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(astronomy, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(study, be related to technology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(study, be related to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(proportion, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(proportion, is related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related to physics)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(literature, be related to life)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(literature, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(literature, be related to history)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(study, be related to technology)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(astronomy, be related)