subway: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, franchise
Weight: 0.58
, convenience store
Weight: 0.58
Siblings deli
Weight: 0.33
, bus stop
Weight: 0.33
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.32
, elevator
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality worth 0.85
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(subway, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(franchise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(subway, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(franchise, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(franchise, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deli, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fast food restaurant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(subway, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(franchise, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(subway, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deli, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(deli, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(subway, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(subway, is best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(subway, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(subway, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(subway, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(subway, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(deli, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(franchise, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(subway, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, has quality good)