success: be measured under natural selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents achievement
Weight: 0.68
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.58
, promise
Weight: 0.58
Siblings good luck
Weight: 0.66
, performance
Weight: 0.64
, defeat
Weight: 0.51
, encore
Weight: 0.50
, dodger
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be measured under natural selection 1.00
be measured under selection 0.96
be measured 0.79
is measured 0.79
be measured in management 0.78
be measured in activity-based management 0.78
be measured by money 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(achievement, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(success, be measured under natural selection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(achievement, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(achievement, be measured)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured in management)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(performance, be measured)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(performance, is measured)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(achievement, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(performance, is measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(performance, is measured)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(performance, be measured) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(performance, be measured in activity-based management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(performance, be measured in management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(performance, be measured in management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(success, be measured under natural selection)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured under selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(success, be measured under selection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be measured)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(success, be measured under selection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(success, be measured by money)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under selection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(success, be measured by money)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(success, be measured by money)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(success, be measured)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured by money)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(success, be measured under natural selection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, be measured)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(performance, is measured)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(performance, be measured)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in activity-based management)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(performance, be measured in management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(success, be measured under natural selection) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(achievement, be measured)