suffering: be in objects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents victim
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, injury
Weight: 0.58
, benefit
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chest pain
Weight: 0.33
, mental illness
Weight: 0.33
, dislocation
Weight: 0.32
, swelling
Weight: 0.32
, illness
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in objects 1.00
be in inanimate objects 0.88
affect motion of object 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, affect motion of object) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(suffering, be in objects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, affect motion of object)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect motion of object)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, affect motion of object) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(suffering, be in objects)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(suffering, be in objects)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(suffering, be in inanimate objects)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be in inanimate objects)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(suffering, be in inanimate objects)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(suffering, be in inanimate objects)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be in objects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(suffering, be in objects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect motion of object)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(suffering, be in objects) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, affect motion of object)