sunglasses: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents accessory
Weight: 0.46
Siblings goggles
Weight: 0.31
, helmet
Weight: 0.30
, handbag
Weight: 0.30
, scarf
Weight: 0.30
, flashlight
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
has quality worth 0.83
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(goggles, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(goggles, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(helmet, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(handbag, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(goggles, is best)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(helmet, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(handbag, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(handbag, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(helmet, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(helmet, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(handbag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(handbag, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(goggles, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(goggles, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(goggles, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(goggles, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(helmet, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(helmet, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(handbag, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(handbag, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(handbag, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(handbag, is best)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(goggles, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(goggles, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sunglasses, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sunglasses, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sunglasses, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sunglasses, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(goggles, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(handbag, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(handbag, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(helmet, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(goggles, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(helmet, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(goggles, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sunglasses, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(handbag, is best)