supervisor: is communicators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is communicators 1.00
need communicators 0.98
is effective communicators 0.96
need effective communicators 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(supervisor, is communicators)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(supervisor, need communicators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need communicators)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, is effective communicators)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, need effective communicators)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supervisor, need communicators)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(supervisor, need communicators)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(supervisor, need effective communicators)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(supervisor, need effective communicators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(supervisor, need effective communicators)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(supervisor, is effective communicators)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(supervisor, is effective communicators)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(supervisor, is effective communicators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, is communicators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(supervisor, is communicators) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(supervisor, is communicators)