supervisor: make quality distinctions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manager
Weight: 0.80
, person
Weight: 0.66
, administrator
Weight: 0.64
, position
Weight: 0.62
Siblings director
Weight: 0.69
, sergeant
Weight: 0.62
, worker
Weight: 0.60
, foreman
Weight: 0.58
, technician
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
make quality distinctions 1.00
make quality distinctions among candidates 0.92
make quality distinctions among eligible candidates 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions among candidates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions among candidates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions among candidates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions among eligible candidates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions among eligible candidates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions among eligible candidates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, make quality distinctions among candidates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, make quality distinctions among eligible candidates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(supervisor, make quality distinctions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(supervisor, make quality distinctions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(supervisor, make quality distinctions)