supplier: be interested in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vendor
Weight: 0.61
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macromedia
Weight: 0.42
, distributor
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, seller
Weight: 0.33
, shipper
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be interested in business 1.00
be interested about business 0.98
be important for business 0.84
be interested in statements 0.82
be interested in financial statements 0.82
be important for business success 0.77
have influence on business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business success)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(supplier, be interested in business)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested about business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested about business)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(supplier, be interested about business)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(supplier, be interested about business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in statements)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business success)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business success)