supplier: have influence on business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vendor
Weight: 0.61
, competitor
Weight: 0.60
, contractor
Weight: 0.60
, third party
Weight: 0.60
, warranty
Weight: 0.58
Siblings macromedia
Weight: 0.42
, distributor
Weight: 0.35
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, seller
Weight: 0.33
, shipper
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have influence on business 1.00
have influence 0.93
influence politics 0.86
influence american politics 0.81
be important for business 0.81
be important for business success 0.79
conduct business on market 0.77
conduct business on black market 0.77
be interested in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(third party, influence politics)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(third party, influence american politics)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(third party, influence american politics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(third party, influence politics)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(third party, influence american politics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business success)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(warranty, be important for business)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(third party, influence politics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(seller, conduct business on black market)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(seller, conduct business on market)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(third party, influence politics)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(third party, influence american politics)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(warranty, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(warranty, be important for business success)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(seller, conduct business on market)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seller, conduct business on market)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(seller, conduct business on black market)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(seller, conduct business on black market)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(supplier, have influence on business)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(supplier, have influence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(supplier, have influence)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(supplier, be interested in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(supplier, be interested in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(supplier, be interested in business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(supplier, be interested in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(supplier, have influence on business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(third party, influence american politics)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business success)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(third party, influence politics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(seller, conduct business on market)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(seller, conduct business on black market)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(third party, influence american politics)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business success)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(warranty, be important for business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(supplier, have influence on business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(third party, influence politics)