supply: be important in economics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents system
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.56
, consideration
Weight: 0.56
Siblings demand
Weight: 0.34
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, consumption
Weight: 0.33
, water plant
Weight: 0.32
, capacity
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in economics 1.00
follow from rules of economics 0.84
be important to science 0.80
be important to environmental science 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important in economics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(demand, be important to environmental science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(demand, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(demand, be important in economics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(demand, follow from rules of economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(demand, follow from rules of economics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(demand, be important to environmental science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(demand, be important to environmental science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(supply, be important in economics)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(supply, be important to science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(supply, be important to environmental science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(supply, follow from rules of economics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important to science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important to environmental science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(supply, be important to science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(supply, be important to environmental science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supply, be important to environmental science)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(supply, be important to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(supply, be important in economics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(demand, be important in economics)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(demand, be important to environmental science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supply, be important in economics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(demand, follow from rules of economics)