supreme court: have power

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court case
Weight: 0.83
, judge
Weight: 0.74
, court
Weight: 0.73
, tribunal
Weight: 0.72
Siblings john marshall
Weight: 0.58
, roe
Weight: 0.53
, county court
Weight: 0.40
, tennis court
Weight: 0.39
, basketball court
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have power 1.00
challenge state power in australia 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supreme court, have power)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court, challenge state power in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supreme court, have power)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(judge, have power)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(court, challenge state power in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(court, challenge state power in australia)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(judge, have power)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(judge, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(supreme court, have power)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(court, challenge state power in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(supreme court, have power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(supreme court, have power)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(supreme court, have power)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, have power)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(court, challenge state power in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(judge, have power)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(supreme court, have power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(court, challenge state power in australia)