surveillance: help crime

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
, intrusion
Weight: 0.60
, mission
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reconnaissance
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.32
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, observation
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
help crime 1.00
help lower crime 0.93
be important to crime scene 0.88
be important to crime investigation 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(observation, be important to crime investigation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(observation, be important to crime scene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to crime scene)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(observation, be important to crime investigation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(observation, be important to crime investigation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(surveillance, help crime)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(surveillance, help lower crime)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(surveillance, help lower crime)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(surveillance, help lower crime)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help lower crime)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(surveillance, help crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime scene)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, help crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(observation, be important to crime investigation)