surveillance: is necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents practice
Weight: 0.60
, application
Weight: 0.60
, intrusion
Weight: 0.60
, mission
Weight: 0.59
, service
Weight: 0.58
Siblings reconnaissance
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.32
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, observation
Weight: 0.32
, service station
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessary 1.00
is needed 0.86
is needed for resources 0.79
need meaningful 0.76
is impossible 0.75
be crucial to process 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, is needed)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mission, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(practice, is needed for resources)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mission, is impossible)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mission, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mission, is impossible)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(practice, is needed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(practice, is needed for resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(mission, is impossible)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(practice, is needed)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(practice, is needed for resources)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mission, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(observation, need meaningful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mission, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(practice, is needed)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(practice, is needed for resources)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(mission, is impossible)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(observation, need meaningful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(observation, need meaningful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(surveillance, is necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is needed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(surveillance, is needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(surveillance, is needed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(surveillance, is needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(surveillance, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mission, is necessary)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mission, is impossible)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(practice, is needed for resources)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(practice, is needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(observation, need meaningful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mission, is necessary)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mission, is impossible)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(practice, is needed for resources)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(surveillance, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(practice, is needed)