swallow: cope in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.60
, bird
Weight: 0.58
, eating
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.41
, songbird
Weight: 0.40
Siblings poison ivy
Weight: 0.31
, crow
Weight: 0.31
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.31
, hawk
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cope in winter 1.00
adapt to winter 0.88
survive in winter 0.88
survive winter 0.88
cope with weathers 0.84
cope with harsh weathers 0.84
migrate in winter 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bird, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(bird, survive winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bird, migrate in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bird, survive in winter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(bird, survive winter)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bird, migrate in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(bird, survive in winter)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bird, survive winter)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bird, migrate in winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(poison ivy, survive winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bird, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(bird, survive winter)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bird, migrate in winter)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(poison ivy, survive winter)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poison ivy, survive winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(swallow, cope in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(swallow, adapt to winter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(swallow, survive in winter)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(swallow, survive winter)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(swallow, adapt to winter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(swallow, survive in winter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, survive winter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(swallow, cope with weathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(swallow, cope with weathers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(swallow, cope with weathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(swallow, adapt to winter)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(swallow, survive in winter)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(swallow, survive winter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(swallow, migrate in winter)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, migrate in winter)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(swallow, migrate in winter)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(swallow, adapt to winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(swallow, survive in winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(swallow, survive winter)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(swallow, migrate in winter)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with weathers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, survive in winter)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, survive winter)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, migrate in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(poison ivy, survive winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, survive in winter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, survive winter)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(swallow, cope in winter)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bird, migrate in winter)