swallow: cope with harsh weathers

Related concepts

Parents	species Weight: 0.60 , bird Weight: 0.58 , eating Weight: 0.45 , child Weight: 0.41 , songbird Weight: 0.40
Siblings	poison ivy Weight: 0.31 , crow Weight: 0.31 , red squirrel Weight: 0.31 , hawk Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
cope with harsh weathers	1.00
cope with weathers	0.96
cope in winter	0.84
survive in winter	0.78
survive winter	0.78
adapt to winter	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(bird, survive in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(bird, survive winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(bird, survive in winter)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(bird, survive winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(bird, survive in winter)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(bird, survive winter)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(poison ivy, survive winter)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(bird, survive in winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(bird, survive winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(poison ivy, survive winter) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(poison ivy, survive winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(swallow, cope with weathers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(swallow, cope with weathers)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(swallow, cope with weathers)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope in winter)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with weathers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(swallow, survive in winter)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(swallow, cope in winter)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(swallow, cope in winter)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(swallow, adapt to winter)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(swallow, survive winter)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(swallow, cope in winter)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(swallow, survive winter)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(swallow, survive winter)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(swallow, survive in winter)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(swallow, survive in winter)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(swallow, adapt to winter)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(swallow, adapt to winter)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(swallow, survive winter)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(swallow, survive in winter)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(swallow, adapt to winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(bird, survive in winter)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(bird, survive winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(poison ivy, survive winter)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(bird, survive in winter)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.66

Typical(swallow, cope with harsh weathers) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(bird, survive winter)