swamp: be at lowlying area

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, waterfall
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at lowlying area 1.00
be at low-lying area 0.86
be at rural area 0.82
be at wet area 0.81
be at south 0.80
be at mountainous area 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(river, be at mountainous area)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pond, be at rural area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(marsh, be at low-lying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pond, be at rural area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pond, be at rural area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(river, be at mountainous area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(river, be at mountainous area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(swamp, be at lowlying area)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(swamp, be at wet area)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(swamp, be at south)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(swamp, be at wet area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(swamp, be at south)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at south)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(swamp, be at south)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at wet area)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(swamp, be at wet area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(swamp, be at lowlying area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pond, be at rural area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marsh, be at low-lying area)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swamp, be at lowlying area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(river, be at mountainous area)