swamp: has quality use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.58
, environment
Weight: 0.55
, fresh water
Weight: 0.54
, shallow water
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sea water
Weight: 0.33
, river
Weight: 0.33
, marsh
Weight: 0.33
, pond
Weight: 0.32
, ditch
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality use 1.00
has quality good 0.88
has quality bad 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality use)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(swamp, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(swamp, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(swamp, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(swamp, has quality use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(swamp, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(swamp, has quality use)