sweden: be considered developed country

Related concepts

Parents	europe Weight: 0.63 , european union Weight: 0.60 , system Weight: 0.59 , nation Weight: 0.57 , south america Weight: 0.57
Siblings	italy Weight: 0.36 , germany Weight: 0.36 , spain Weight: 0.36 , england Weight: 0.36 , latin america Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered developed country	1.00
is developed	0.88
is known for	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(sweden, be considered developed country)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(europe, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(sweden, be considered developed country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(europe, is developed)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(south america, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(south america, is developed)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(europe, is developed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(latin america, is developed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(south america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(europe, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(latin america, is developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(latin america, is developed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(sweden, be considered developed country)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(sweden, is developed)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(sweden, is known for)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(sweden, is developed)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(sweden, is known for)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(sweden, is developed)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(sweden, is developed)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(sweden, is known for)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sweden, is known for)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(sweden, be considered developed country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(europe, is developed)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(latin america, is developed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(europe, is developed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Typical(sweden, be considered developed country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(south america, is developed)