sweet potato: be better for diabetics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents potato
Weight: 0.74
, vegetable
Weight: 0.74
, flavor
Weight: 0.73
, onion ring
Weight: 0.69
Siblings butternut
Weight: 0.54
, potato salad
Weight: 0.40
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.39
, pear
Weight: 0.38
, tomato juice
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better for diabetics 1.00
be good for diabetics 0.98
be bad for kidney disease 0.76
is fruits better than multivitamins 0.75
be healthier than white 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(potato, be healthier than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(potato, be healthier than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be good for diabetics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sweet potato, be healthier than white)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sweet potato, be healthier than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pear, be good for diabetics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(sweet potato, be better for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(potato, be healthier than white)