swimming pool: be covered in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.67
, pool
Weight: 0.66
, beach
Weight: 0.66
, golf course
Weight: 0.65
Siblings scuba diving
Weight: 0.69
, tennis court
Weight: 0.65
, tennis
Weight: 0.62
, volleyball
Weight: 0.59
, diving
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered in florida 1.00
be in florida 0.93
be enclosed in florida 0.87
be screened in florida 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pool, be enclosed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pool, be covered in florida)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pool, be enclosed in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pool, be covered in florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be enclosed in florida)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pool, be enclosed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pool, be covered in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pool, be covered in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)