pool: be in florida

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents swimming pool
Weight: 0.86
, event
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.59
Siblings fountain
Weight: 0.62
, clo
Weight: 0.42
, scuba diving
Weight: 0.33
, synchronized swimming
Weight: 0.33
, deck
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in florida 1.00
be in florida small 0.96
be cold in florida 0.95
be covered in florida 0.93
have screens in florida 0.89
be enclosed in florida 0.87
be in florida indoors 0.86
is michigan 0.84
be screened in in florida 0.83
be screened in florida 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be covered in florida)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(swimming pool, be screened in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(fountain, is michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(swimming pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(swimming pool, be covered in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(swimming pool, be screened in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(fountain, is michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fountain, is michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(pool, be in florida)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pool, have screens in florida)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, have screens in florida)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pool, have screens in florida)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pool, be cold in florida)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pool, have screens in florida)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(pool, be cold in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(pool, be cold in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pool, be covered in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pool, be cold in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pool, be covered in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(pool, be screened in in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(pool, be covered in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(pool, be covered in florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pool, be in florida indoors)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pool, be screened in in florida)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(pool, be in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fountain, is michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be enclosed in florida)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be screened in florida)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(pool, be in florida) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(swimming pool, be covered in florida)