switzerland: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents european union
Weight: 0.66
, europe
Weight: 0.62
, japan
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, world
Weight: 0.59
Siblings finland
Weight: 0.53
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, poland
Weight: 0.36
, italy
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is great 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(japan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(switzerland, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(world, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(switzerland, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(switzerland, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(european union, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(world, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(japan, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(european union, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(world, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(japan, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(latin america, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(latin america, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(finland, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(poland, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(germany, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(japan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(switzerland, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(world, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(switzerland, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(european union, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(switzerland, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(germany, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(germany, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(poland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(poland, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(latin america, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(latin america, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(finland, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(finland, is great)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(latin america, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(latin america, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(switzerland, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(switzerland, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is great)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is great)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(switzerland, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(switzerland, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(world, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(japan, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(poland, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(germany, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(latin america, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(finland, is great)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(latin america, is great)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(european union, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(world, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(switzerland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(japan, has quality good)