sword: be called swords

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents weapon
Weight: 0.62
, artifact
Weight: 0.61
, blade
Weight: 0.59
, tool
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gladiator
Weight: 0.54
, rapier
Weight: 0.53
, submachine gun
Weight: 0.36
, spear
Weight: 0.35
, knife
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called swords 1.00
be at better armor penetration than swords 0.82
beat spears 0.77
plural of is knives 0.77
have hilts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(spear, be at better armor penetration than swords)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(knife, plural of is knives)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(knife, plural of is knives)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(knife, plural of is knives)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(spear, be at better armor penetration than swords)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(spear, be at better armor penetration than swords)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(sword, be called swords)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sword, have hilts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sword, have hilts)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sword, have hilts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sword, have hilts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sword, be called swords)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sword, be called swords)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(knife, plural of is knives)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sword, be called swords)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(spear, be at better armor penetration than swords)