syntax: be important in piece writing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, detail
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings programming language
Weight: 0.67
, annotation
Weight: 0.33
, boolean logic
Weight: 0.33
, boolean algebra
Weight: 0.33
, filename
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in piece writing 1.00
be important in writing 0.91
be important in technical writing 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in writing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in writing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(detail, be important in writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in writing)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(syntax, be important in technical writing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in technical writing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in technical writing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in technical writing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(detail, be important in writing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be important in writing)