syphilis: has state concern

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents infection
Weight: 0.70
, illness
Weight: 0.66
, sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.57
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, genital herpes
Weight: 0.37
, gonorrhea
Weight: 0.37
, tuberculosis
Weight: 0.37
, hepatitis
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state concern 1.00
has state problem 0.84
is public health threat 0.76
is health issue 0.75
is health threat 0.75
is public health issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state concern)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state concern)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(infection, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(illness, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(illness, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(infection, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is public health issue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tuberculosis, is public health threat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(illness, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state concern)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(infection, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state concern)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(tuberculosis, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(gonorrhea, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(gonorrhea, has state problem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(tuberculosis, is public health threat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is public health threat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(tuberculosis, is public health issue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tuberculosis, is public health issue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(syphilis, has state concern)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state problem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(syphilis, has state problem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(syphilis, has state problem)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(syphilis, has state concern)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(gonorrhea, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is public health threat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(tuberculosis, is public health issue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(infection, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(syphilis, has state concern) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illness, has state problem)