table: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be at in restaurant 0.79
be at fast-food restaurant 0.79
be at restaurant 0.79
be find in restaurant 0.77
be at cafe 0.76
be used to lounge 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(food, be at in restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(food, be at restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(food, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be used to lounge)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(food, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(table, be at bar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sofa, be used to lounge)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(sofa, be used to lounge)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(table, be at bar)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at in restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(table, be at restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(table, be at cafe)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(table, be at in restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at restaurant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(table, be at cafe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(table, be at restaurant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(table, be at restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(table, be at in restaurant)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(table, be at cafe)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(table, be at cafe)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(table, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(table, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(table, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(table, be at in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(table, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sofa, be used to lounge)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(food, be at in restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(table, be at bar)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(food, be at restaurant)