table: be at leave of hutch

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at leave of hutch 1.00
be at right of hutch 0.96
be at cupboard 0.76
be front of sofa 0.75
be at back of sofa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(food, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(food, be at cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(food, be at cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, be front of sofa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(food, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coffee table, be front of sofa)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(coffee table, be front of sofa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(table, be at leave of hutch)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(table, be at right of hutch)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(table, be at right of hutch)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(table, be at right of hutch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(food, be at cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coffee table, be front of sofa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(food, be at cupboard)