table: be at right of hutch

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
, food
Weight: 0.59
, stage
Weight: 0.59
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, sofa
Weight: 0.61
, hand
Weight: 0.60
, roulette
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at right of hutch 1.00
be at leave of hutch 0.96
be front of sofa 0.76
be at back of sofa 0.76
be defined as same as settee 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coffee table, be front of sofa)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sofa, be defined as same as settee)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(sofa, be defined as same as settee) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sofa, be defined as same as settee)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coffee table, be front of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(coffee table, be front of sofa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(table, be at right of hutch)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(table, be at leave of hutch)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(table, be at leave of hutch)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(table, be at leave of hutch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(table, be at leave of hutch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(table, be at right of hutch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(sofa, be defined as same as settee)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(table, be at right of hutch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(coffee table, be front of sofa)