table: count blank cells

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hash table
Weight: 0.76
, dining room
Weight: 0.65
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, dining table
Weight: 0.74
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, table saw
Weight: 0.64
, sofa
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
count blank cells 1.00
count cells 0.89
have blank 0.87
is blank 0.86
show blank 0.84
be blank on laptop 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table, count blank cells)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screen, be blank on laptop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.13
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(table, count blank cells)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(table, count blank cells)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(table, is blank)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(table, have blank)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(table, is blank)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(table, is blank)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(table, show blank)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, count blank cells)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(table, count blank cells)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(screen, be blank on laptop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(table, count blank cells)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(screen, be blank on laptop)