table: have blank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hash table
Weight: 0.76
, dining room
Weight: 0.65
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, sign
Weight: 0.62
Siblings picnic table
Weight: 0.81
, dining table
Weight: 0.74
, coffee table
Weight: 0.72
, table saw
Weight: 0.64
, sofa
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
have blank 1.00
is blank 0.99
show blank 0.96
be blank on laptop 0.88
count blank cells 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(table, have blank)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(screen, be blank on laptop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(screen, be blank on laptop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(table, have blank)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(table, have blank)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(table, is blank)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(table, is blank)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(table, is blank)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(table, is blank)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(table, show blank)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(table, have blank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(table, have blank)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(screen, be blank on laptop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(table, have blank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(screen, be blank on laptop)