tablet: be better than phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than phones 1.00
be cheaper than phones 0.94
be slower than phones 0.92
be better than flip phones 0.92
be different from phones 0.92
make phones 0.92
be different from other phones 0.91
be called phones 0.90
take longer charge than phones 0.90
be much cheaper than smartphones 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, make phones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be different from other phones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, make phones)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nokia, make phones)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(smartphone, be different from other phones)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be different from other phones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than phones)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nokia, make phones)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(smartphone, be different from other phones)