tablet: be slower than phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slower than phones 1.00
be better than phones 0.92
be cheaper than phones 0.90
get slower 0.88
be much cheaper than smartphones 0.87
be better than flip phones 0.87
be less expensive than smartphones 0.87
be cheaper than smartphones 0.87
be faster than computers 0.86
be different from phones 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get slower)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(smartphone, get slower) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get slower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tablet, be slower than phones)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(tablet, get slower)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(tablet, get slower)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(tablet, get slower)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(tablet, get slower)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tablet, be slower than phones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(smartphone, get slower)