tablet: be less expensive than smartphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less expensive than smartphones 1.00
be much cheaper than smartphones 0.97
be cheaper than smartphones 0.97
be called smartphones 0.90
be cheaper than phones 0.89
be more expensive than laptops 0.89
be better than phones 0.87
be slower than phones 0.87
be more expensive than tablets 0.87
cost more than laptops 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be called smartphones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(smartphone, be called smartphones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be called smartphones)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smartphone, be called smartphones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)