smartphone: cost more than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than laptops 1.00
be more expensive than laptops 0.96
be better than laptops 0.94
cost more than tablets 0.86
be faster than computers 0.85
be more expensive than tablets 0.82
get more expensive 0.80
be considered computers 0.80
be more expensive than than tv 0.79
be cheaper than iphones 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be considered computers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(smartphone, be faster than computers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)