smartphone: cost more than tablets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost more than tablets 1.00
be more expensive than tablets 0.97
be better than tablets 0.94
cost more than laptops 0.86
be more expensive than laptops 0.81
be better than laptops 0.78
be cheaper than iphone 0.77
be more expensive than than tv 0.77
be cheaper than iphones 0.76
get more expensive 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than laptops)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(smartphone, get more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(smartphone, get more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(smartphone, cost more than tablets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)