ipad: be cheaper than iphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tablet computer
Weight: 0.72
, laptop
Weight: 0.69
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, ipod
Weight: 0.66
, tablet
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.39
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, nokia
Weight: 0.36
, thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, android
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than iphones 1.00
be better than iphones 0.96
be cheaper than iphone 0.93
be called ipads 0.83
show iphone apps 0.80
be pro better than ipad 0.79
be faster than laptops 0.79
be better than laptops 0.79
show iphone apps in low resolution 0.79
be faster than laptop 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ipad, be called ipads)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ipad, be called ipads)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ipad, be called ipads)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be called ipads)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than laptops)