ipad: be faster than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tablet computer
Weight: 0.72
, laptop
Weight: 0.69
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, ipod
Weight: 0.66
, tablet
Weight: 0.64
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.39
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, nokia
Weight: 0.36
, thinkpad
Weight: 0.35
, android
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be faster than laptops 1.00
be better than laptops 0.96
be faster than laptop 0.95
be cheaper than iphones 0.79
be better than other tablets 0.79
be better than iphones 0.78
be better than tablets 0.78
be cheaper than iphone 0.77
be better than chromebooks 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be better than tablets)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than tablets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(laptop, be better than tablets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smartphone, be better than tablets)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than laptops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptop)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be better than chromebooks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laptop, be better than tablets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphones)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphones)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than tablets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(ipad, be faster than laptops)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(laptop, be better than tablets)