tablet: be cheaper than smartphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than smartphones 1.00
be much cheaper than smartphones 0.99
be less expensive than smartphones 0.97
be cheaper than phones 0.93
be called smartphones 0.92
be better than phones 0.88
be slower than phones 0.87
be more expensive than laptops 0.86
be more expensive than tablets 0.85
be better than laptops 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be called smartphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(smartphone, be called smartphones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be called smartphones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than phones)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be slower than phones)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(tablet, be much cheaper than smartphones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(tablet, be less expensive than smartphones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than laptops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than laptops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(smartphone, be called smartphones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than laptops)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than tablets)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(smartphone, be more expensive than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tablet, be cheaper than smartphones)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)