tablet: be just blown up smart phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, personal computer
Weight: 0.67
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.64
, market
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.60
, nook
Weight: 0.55
, playbook
Weight: 0.51
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.41
, smartphone
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be just blown up smart phones 1.00
be different from phones 0.82
be better than phones 0.82
make phones 0.81
be better than flip phones 0.81
be called phones 0.80
be different from other phones 0.80
be called smart 0.79
is smart 0.79
make android phones 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, make phones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is smart)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be called smart)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be different from other phones)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nokia, make android phones)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, make phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(nokia, make phones)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(smartphone, be better than flip phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(smartphone, be different from other phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be different from other phones)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nokia, make android phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(nokia, make android phones)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smartphone, be called smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be called smart)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(smartphone, is smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is smart)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(tablet, be just blown up smart phones)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tablet, be better than phones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(tablet, be better than phones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(tablet, be better than phones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be better than phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(tablet, be just blown up smart phones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nokia, make phones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(smartphone, be better than flip phones)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nokia, make android phones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(smartphone, be different from other phones)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(smartphone, be called smart)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tablet, be just blown up smart phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(smartphone, is smart)