taco bell: be named bell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, fast food chain
Weight: 0.72
, mexican food
Weight: 0.70
, food chain
Weight: 0.70
Siblings taco
Weight: 0.38
, burrito
Weight: 0.37
, tamale
Weight: 0.37
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.37
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be named bell 1.00
be called bell 0.95
have bell 0.94
is bell good 0.93
has shape bell 0.91
is bell fucking good 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(taco, is bell good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taco, has shape bell)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(taco, is bell fucking good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taco, has shape bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(taco, has shape bell)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(taco, is bell fucking good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(taco, is bell fucking good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(taco, is bell good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(taco, is bell good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(taco bell, be named bell)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(taco bell, have bell)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(taco bell, be called bell)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(taco bell, be called bell)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(taco bell, have bell)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taco bell, be called bell)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(taco bell, have bell)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be called bell)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, have bell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taco bell, be named bell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(taco, has shape bell)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(taco, is bell good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, be named bell) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(taco, is bell fucking good)