talc: be in makeup

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, powder
Weight: 0.59
, filler
Weight: 0.57
, ingredient
Weight: 0.57
Siblings cobalt
Weight: 0.35
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.35
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.35
, silica
Weight: 0.35
, sulfuric acid
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in makeup 1.00
be used in makeup 0.98
be in makeup bad 0.97
be bad in eyeshadow 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(silica, be in makeup)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(silica, be used in makeup)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(silica, be used in makeup)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(silica, be used in makeup)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(silica, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(silica, be in makeup)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(talc, be in makeup)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(talc, be used in makeup)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(talc, be in makeup bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(talc, be used in makeup)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(talc, be in makeup bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(talc, be used in makeup)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(talc, be used in makeup)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(talc, be bad in eyeshadow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(talc, be in makeup)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, be used in makeup)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, be in makeup)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(silica, be used in makeup)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(talc, be in makeup)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(silica, be in makeup)